It all depends on what "this" is modifying. If "this" is self-referential, then the statement is incoherent. If "this" refers to some other proposition, say y=the sky is green, then x would be true, e.g., this proposition [implying y] is false.
Insights and discussion from current, former, and future Denver Seminary Philosophy of Religion students. We welcome comments and discussion from within and without.
3 Comments:
The statement is self-referentially absurd.
By Pilgrim in Progress, at 12:32 PM
B Jay
It all depends on what "this" is modifying. If "this" is self-referential, then the statement is incoherent. If "this" refers to some other proposition, say y=the sky is green, then x would be true, e.g., this proposition [implying y] is false.
By Jeremy, at 12:44 PM
Jeremy,
Let X be: "This statement is false."
This proposition is an "identity statement," if you will.
Let us write it this way:
X = This statement is false.
The question "is X true or false" must therefore regard the content that we have assigned to X, namely, that x= this statement is false.
"This," therefore, does not refer to any other proposition.
"This" can only refer to the statement itself.
Therefore, the statement is self-referentially absurd.
By Pilgrim in Progress, at 8:27 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home