No Retraciton Here

David, I do not retract my statement of 2/4. I will merely clarify that it was a response to BJ's 2nd Zoink attempt, in which he postulated a necessary Zoink. My response was that ONLY the greatest being could be necessary (dragging in the cosmological phraseology that BJ inserted into the dialog).

Now back to poor Onto...

Can you postulate anything greater than an existent omniscient, omnipotent, morally perfect being?

The very fact that you can not, means that this being must in fact exist.

Is it this portion of the argument that you are questioning, or is it the jump equating this being with God?